STAY INFORMED
Sign up for our Newsletter
-
Evaluating the 2ISECAP Approach
KEY INSIGHTS AND RESULTS
introduction
The 2ISECAP project aims to improve Integrated Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Planning (ISECAP) by using Living Labs (LLs) to foster collaboration and innovation across European municipalities. The evaluation conducted at the ned of the project provides insights into the effectiveness, impact, and scalability of the 2ISECAP approach.
The evaluation focused on assessing the overall performance of the Integrated SECAP approach and six pilot Integrated Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs). It analyzed the role and effectiveness of Living Labs in the planning process and explored the potential for replication and transferability of the 2ISECAP methodology.
Methodological Approach
The evaluation framework incorporated multiple performance indicators, considering stakeholder involvement, service creation, infrastructure, organization and governance, innovation outcomes, and methods and tools. The benchmarking tool, the Interoperability Cube Model, was applied to measure the maturity levels of Living Labs and their impact on planning outcomes.
Key FINDINGS
Performance of Integrated SECAPs
The six SECAPs were evaluated based on their effectiveness, impact, and feasibility. The assessment considered investment mobilization, CO₂ reduction potential, and stakeholder engagement. While all SECAPs introduced climate action measures, their implementation faced varying challenges across different regions.
Effectiveness of Living Labs (LLs)
Living Labs played a crucial role in co-creation and stakeholder participation. Their performance varied, influenced by governance models, cultural differences, and institutional capacity. Some Living Labs demonstrated higher maturity levels in engaging stakeholders and producing actionable results.
Innovation & Knowledge Sharing
The project promoted open innovation and collaborative planning. Digital tools and participatory methods enhanced stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange. Additionally, capacity-building activities strengthened local expertise and cooperation.
Replication & Transferability Potential
The evaluation found strong interest in replicating the 2ISECAP model in other municipalities and regions. Policy alignment and institutional support are critical for successful replication. Strengthening financing mechanisms and improving policy integration at multiple governance levels were identified as key recommendations.
ve
CONCLUSION
The 2ISECAP project has demonstrated that Living Labs are effective in advancing integrated energy and climate planning. They provide a collaborative space for stakeholders to experiment, innovate, and co-develop solutions that align with local needs. While institutionalization remains a challenge, the evaluation results provide a strong foundation for future adoption and policy mainstreaming. The findings highlight that a well-structured Living Lab approach can enhance transparency, inclusivity, and efficiency in sustainable energy planning.
What’s Next?
To enhance the scalability and long-term impact of the 2ISECAP approach, future efforts should focus on expanding stakeholder engagement to include more local and regional actors. Improving policy alignment at national and EU levels and developing innovative financing mechanisms will support long-term implementation. The results of this evaluation provide valuable insights for municipalities, policymakers, and energy planners looking to implement sustainable energy and climate action strategies using an inclusive, participatory approach.